Ciderhelm
06-06-2007, 07:43 AM
http://secondlife.reuters.com/stories/2007/05/31/judge-rules-against-one-sided-tos-in-bragg-lawsuit/
Judge rules against ‘one-sided’ TOS in Bragg lawsuit
Thu May 31, 2007 12:05pm PDT By Eric Reuters
SECOND LIFE, May 31 (Reuters) - A Pennsylvania judge has ruled that Linden Lab’s terms of service (http://secondlife.com/corporate/tos.php) for Second Life residents are not legally binding, according to court papers (http://lawy-ers.com/robreno_order.pdf) filed on Wednesday.
The ruling came in the case of Bragg v. Linden Research (http://www.prnewswire.com/news/index_mail.shtml?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/05-08-2006/0004356685&EDATE=). Marc Bragg, a lawyer from West Chester, Pa., filed suit in 2006 claiming that Linden unfairly terminated his account, causing the loss of his virtual business venture. Linden filed motions to dismiss the suit and compel Bragg to arbitrate his claim out of court, consistent with Linden’s Terms of Service.
Judge Eduardo Robreno ruled on May 30 that Linden’s Terms of Service constitute a “contract of adhesion” (http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected=2325), allowing the suit to proceed.
“Linden presents the TOS on a take-it-or-leave-it basis,” he wrote. “In effect, the TOS provide Linden with a variety of one-sided remedies to resolve disputes, while forcing its customers to arbitrate any disputes with Linden.”
“The arbitration clause is not designed to provide Second Life participants an effective means of resolving disputes with Linden. Rather, it is a one-sided means which tilts unfairly, in almost all cases, in Linden’s favor,” Robreno added.
Bragg’s lawsuit named Linden Lab Chief Executive Philip Rosedale as a defendant. Linden’s motion to have Rosedale’s name removed from the suit was also denied by Robreno.
Bragg had identified a means to purchase land in Second Life below market rates. After he purchased thousands of U.S. dollars worth of virtual real estate in this manner, Linden Lab summarily terminated his account, prompting his lawsuit.
It's a great thing to have technologically illiterate judges making these decisions. I'm simply amazed this was compared to a contract of adhesion since it's a game.
Judge rules against ‘one-sided’ TOS in Bragg lawsuit
Thu May 31, 2007 12:05pm PDT By Eric Reuters
SECOND LIFE, May 31 (Reuters) - A Pennsylvania judge has ruled that Linden Lab’s terms of service (http://secondlife.com/corporate/tos.php) for Second Life residents are not legally binding, according to court papers (http://lawy-ers.com/robreno_order.pdf) filed on Wednesday.
The ruling came in the case of Bragg v. Linden Research (http://www.prnewswire.com/news/index_mail.shtml?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/05-08-2006/0004356685&EDATE=). Marc Bragg, a lawyer from West Chester, Pa., filed suit in 2006 claiming that Linden unfairly terminated his account, causing the loss of his virtual business venture. Linden filed motions to dismiss the suit and compel Bragg to arbitrate his claim out of court, consistent with Linden’s Terms of Service.
Judge Eduardo Robreno ruled on May 30 that Linden’s Terms of Service constitute a “contract of adhesion” (http://dictionary.law.com/definition2.asp?selected=2325), allowing the suit to proceed.
“Linden presents the TOS on a take-it-or-leave-it basis,” he wrote. “In effect, the TOS provide Linden with a variety of one-sided remedies to resolve disputes, while forcing its customers to arbitrate any disputes with Linden.”
“The arbitration clause is not designed to provide Second Life participants an effective means of resolving disputes with Linden. Rather, it is a one-sided means which tilts unfairly, in almost all cases, in Linden’s favor,” Robreno added.
Bragg’s lawsuit named Linden Lab Chief Executive Philip Rosedale as a defendant. Linden’s motion to have Rosedale’s name removed from the suit was also denied by Robreno.
Bragg had identified a means to purchase land in Second Life below market rates. After he purchased thousands of U.S. dollars worth of virtual real estate in this manner, Linden Lab summarily terminated his account, prompting his lawsuit.
It's a great thing to have technologically illiterate judges making these decisions. I'm simply amazed this was compared to a contract of adhesion since it's a game.