Gentlemen of Leisure

Go Back   Gentlemen of Leisure > Public Forums > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2010, 04:31 AM
Fusa Fusa is offline
Fuse Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,594
Quote:
Can Amazon be accountable too though?
lawyers would fight anything, just like that craigslist bullshit with the prosistution of women via craiglist.


logistically it would be to much for a site to filter everysingle ad, and im sure im the terms of argeement it would say something about what you advertise yadda yadda yadda, in the end we're not liable.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2010, 11:41 AM
Gronthor's Avatar
Gronthor Gronthor is offline
GoL Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 382
The check and balances of this would be that the public would boycott Amazon over this enough to hit their books to force the organization to drop the book. Thus you keep freedom of speech but public opposition to the company policy would invoke the change.

The problem is that i would say the majority of people would find this immoral (the book) the media in which we rely on does not share the same values as the general public.
__________________
Level 100 Characters:
Horde --

Alliance --
Balrin|Brondor|Gronthor|Ironshot|
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2010, 11:54 AM
Onion's Avatar
Onion Onion is offline
Fuse Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,357
Send a message via ICQ to Onion Send a message via AIM to Onion Send a message via MSN to Onion
According to that CNN article, part of Amazon's guidelines for what is not allowed say:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CNN
Pornography, offensive material and "titles which may lead to... illegal activity" are among the prohibited content listed in the guidelines.
I don't see how this falls out of that category. I would say it qualifies as both offensive (to the large majority) and potentially leading to illegal activity. That being said, with the vast amount of books out there that tell you how to make a bomb or kill someone, I don't see the latter argument holding any water.

The point of the first amendment was to provide everyone with protection to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't infringe on that same right of someone else, as well as the law (provided the law is constitutional).

Someone buying the book, or Amazon selling it, isn't what I see as wrong, but if something happened as a result of someone owning the book I believe the author should be held responsible like in that case with the book "Hit Man". If you're going to instruct someone how to do something and publish it for anyone to obtain, you should be responsible for the repercussions of that decision. People are held responsible for yelling FIRE in a crowded area if anyone is injured, I see it as the same issue.

Last edited by Onion; 11-12-2010 at 11:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.